Re: [PATCH 5/6] drivers/atm: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-16 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Julia Lawall write s: >In each case below, I have followed the original semantics, but in >drivers/atm/eni.c and drivers/atm/horizon.c, I have some doubts as to >whether the original semantics is correct. In drivers/atm/eni.c, is the >division intended to be by div

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drivers/atm: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-16 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Julia Lawall write s: In each case below, I have followed the original semantics, but in drivers/atm/eni.c and drivers/atm/horizon.c, I have some doubts as to whether the original semantics is correct. In drivers/atm/eni.c, is the division intended to be by div or by

[PATCH 5/6] drivers/atm: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-14 Thread Julia Lawall
In each case below, I have followed the original semantics, but in drivers/atm/eni.c and drivers/atm/horizon.c, I have some doubts as to whether the original semantics is correct. In drivers/atm/eni.c, is the division intended to be by div or by div-1? In drivers/atm/horizon.c, it seems strange

[PATCH 5/6] drivers/atm: Use DIV_ROUND_UP

2008-02-14 Thread Julia Lawall
In each case below, I have followed the original semantics, but in drivers/atm/eni.c and drivers/atm/horizon.c, I have some doubts as to whether the original semantics is correct. In drivers/atm/eni.c, is the division intended to be by div or by div-1? In drivers/atm/horizon.c, it seems strange