On Friday, November 02, 2012 01:17:10 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 10/30/2012 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>>
> >>> If the caller
On Friday, November 02, 2012 01:17:10 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On 10/30/2012 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the
On 10/30/2012 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>>
>>> If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
>>> struct
On 10/30/2012 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
> > struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
> struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in question, it
> doesn't make sense for it to go through
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in question, it
doesn't make sense for it to go
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
struct acpi_device object corresponding to the
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in question, it
doesn't make sense for it to go through acpi_bus_get_device(), which
may be costly, because it involves acquiring the global ACPI
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in question, it
doesn't make sense for it to go through acpi_bus_get_device(), which
may be costly, because it involves
10 matches
Mail list logo