Re: [PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-15 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
2012/11/15 Steven Rostedt : > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:37 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c >> index 64eddd5..b3c113a 100644 >> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c >> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c >> @@ -99,6 +99,17 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)

Re: [PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-15 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
2012/11/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org: On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:37 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c index 64eddd5..b3c113a 100644 --- a/kernel/irq_work.c +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c @@ -99,6 +99,17 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work

Re: [PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:37 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the > queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not > find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc:

[PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-14 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton Cc:

[PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-14 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner

Re: [PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 21:37 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker

[PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-08 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton Cc:

[PATCH 5/7] irq_work: Don't stop the tick with pending works

2012-11-08 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Don't stop the tick if we have pending irq works on the queue, otherwise if the arch can't raise self-IPIs, we may not find an opportunity to execute the pending works for a while. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner