Hi Andy,
On 14 April 2015 at 17:33, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 03:52 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>
>> x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
>> breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
>
>
> In the future, please cc the author of
On 04/14/2015 03:52 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
In the future, please cc the author of recently-written code that you're
fixing :)
This patch is really weird. You're
x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 35 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff
On 04/14/2015 03:52 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
In the future, please cc the author of recently-written code that you're
fixing :)
This patch is really weird. You're
Hi Andy,
On 14 April 2015 at 17:33, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On 04/14/2015 03:52 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
In the future, please cc the author of
x86 tests should not be built when ARCH != x86. Reused the logic from
breakpoints to determine when it's appropriate to build.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker tyler.ba...@linaro.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 35 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12
6 matches
Mail list logo