On 23-06-15, 08:08, Lee Jones wrote:
> Because the CPUFreq regulator is controlled with PWM and CPUFreq will
> fail on STiH410 (my main development platform) without it.
I see, probably this should find a place in the cover-letter :)
> It's safe for you to ignore it though.
Thanks :)
--
viresh
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This also incorporates the STiH410.
>
> Any explanation to why this patch is part of this series ?
Because the CPUFreq regulator is controlled with PWM and CPUFreq will
fail on STiH410 (my main development platfor
On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> This also incorporates the STiH410.
Any explanation to why this patch is part of this series ?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This also incorporates the STiH410.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 29 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi| 28
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s
4 matches
Mail list logo
