Re: [PATCH 5/8] LinuxPPS: pps_parport: Do not generate assert in case of lost signal.

On 02/15/17 15:31, Andrey Drobyshev wrote: From: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Since clear timeout is non-zero, some clear event capture is requested. Therefore, if signal is lost we shouldn't generate assert event alone. Signed-off-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov

Re: [PATCH 5/8] LinuxPPS: pps_parport: Do not generate assert in case of lost signal.

On 02/15/17 15:31, Andrey Drobyshev wrote: From: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Since clear timeout is non-zero, some clear event capture is requested. Therefore, if signal is lost we shouldn't generate assert event alone. Signed-off-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti

[PATCH 5/8] LinuxPPS: pps_parport: Do not generate assert in case of lost signal.

From: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Since clear timeout is non-zero, some clear event capture is requested. Therefore, if signal is lost we shouldn't generate assert event alone. Signed-off-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov --- drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c | 5 - 1

[PATCH 5/8] LinuxPPS: pps_parport: Do not generate assert in case of lost signal.

From: Alexander GQ Gerasiov Since clear timeout is non-zero, some clear event capture is requested. Therefore, if signal is lost we shouldn't generate assert event alone. Signed-off-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov --- drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1