Daniel Mack writes:
> In particular, the pxa camera driver is something Robert (cc) wanted to
> have a look at. Robert, any updates on this?
Oh yes, sorry, it's been monthes, I've been very busy.
This is my last status :
- my current patch is in (1)
- this patch doesn't work yet
- if my
Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com writes:
In particular, the pxa camera driver is something Robert (cc) wanted to
have a look at. Robert, any updates on this?
Oh yes, sorry, it's been monthes, I've been very busy.
This is my last status :
- my current patch is in (1)
- this patch doesn't work
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 01:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We never intentionally break things that people are using, but there are
> cases where doing blind changes is the best way forward. We should
> always try to find people to test patches on real hardware if possible,
> which is only possible
On Monday 09 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > > Nice to have Daniel in this conversation. Your patch series is a big and
> > > important work. However, I am not sure I will ever land
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> It hasn't made it upstream yet, but see
> >>>
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > Nice to have Daniel in this conversation. Your patch series is a big and
> > important work. However, I am not sure I will ever land as is exactly
> > for this reason.
>
> Well, I wouldn't
On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA.
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:34 +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > >> Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
> > >>
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> >> Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
> >> IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
> >>
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
device tree.
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:34 +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA.
On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Nice to have Daniel in this conversation. Your patch series is a big and
important work. However, I am not sure I will ever land as is exactly
for this reason.
Well, I wouldn't be so
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:04 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 02:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
It hasn't made it upstream yet, but see
On Monday 09 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:34 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Nice to have Daniel in this conversation. Your patch series is a big and
important work. However, I am not sure I will ever land as is
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 01:25 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We never intentionally break things that people are using, but there are
cases where doing blind changes is the best way forward. We should
always try to find people to test patches on real hardware if possible,
which is only possible if
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
> IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
> device tree.
I just wrote a lengthy reply to this email to explain in what ways
you got it wrong, but then I saw
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
device tree.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich
CC: Daniel Mack
CC: Arnd Bergmann
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/pxa-mmc.txt | 2 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
device tree.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich ynv...@gmail.com
CC: Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com
CC: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
---
On Sunday 08 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as
IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from
device tree.
I just wrote a lengthy reply to this email to explain in what ways
you got it wrong, but then I saw that
20 matches
Mail list logo
