Re: [PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-11 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > + > > + init_completion(>done), > > + > > I'll convert that to a semicolon... Gawd, thanks... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-11 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: + + init_completion(port-done), + I'll convert that to a semicolon... Gawd, thanks... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-09 Thread Jeff Dike
From: Esben Nielsen One of the problems was use of direct architecture specific semaphores (which doesn't work under PREEMPT_REALTIME) and in places where a quick (maybe too quick) look at the code told me that completions ought to be used. Therefore I changed two semaphores to completions which

Re: [PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-09 Thread Andrew Morton
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > @@ -197,13 +197,14 @@ > { .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->list), > .wait_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0), > .has_connection = 0, > - .sem =

Re: [PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-09 Thread Andrew Morton
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @@ -197,13 +197,14 @@ { .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port-list), .wait_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0), .has_connection = 0, - .sem =

[PATCH 5/9] UML - change semaphores to completions

2005-03-09 Thread Jeff Dike
From: Esben Nielsen simlo at phys au dk One of the problems was use of direct architecture specific semaphores (which doesn't work under PREEMPT_REALTIME) and in places where a quick (maybe too quick) look at the code told me that completions ought to be used. Therefore I changed two semaphores