On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 05:57, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu
>
> Thanks for the review! please find few comments below.
>
> On 8/25/20 12:47 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:47:28PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >> The name service announcement should not be
Hi Mathieu
Thanks for the review! please find few comments below.
On 8/25/20 12:47 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:47:28PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> The name service announcement should not be linked to the RPMsg virtio bus
>> but to the RPMsg protocol itself.
>>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:47:28PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The name service announcement should not be linked to the RPMsg virtio bus
> but to the RPMsg protocol itself.
>
> This patch proposes to break the dependency with the RPmsg virtio bus by
> the introduction of the reserved RPMsg
Hi Arnaud,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20200730]
[also build test WARNING on v5.8]
[cannot apply to linux/master linus/master rpmsg/for-next v5.8-rc7 v5.8-rc6
v5.8-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
The name service announcement should not be linked to the RPMsg virtio bus
but to the RPMsg protocol itself.
This patch proposes to break the dependency with the RPmsg virtio bus by
the introduction of the reserved RPMsg name service driver which will be in
charge of managing the RPMsg name
5 matches
Mail list logo