Re: [PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
Please ignore. Wrong patch set. On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is > redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are > combined. > > In the second case, add an initialization

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds

Re: [PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
Please ignore. Wrong patch set. On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Julia Lawall wrote: From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2015-04-05 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2014-11-23 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2014-11-23 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2012-08-19 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds

[PATCH 5/9] sound/atmel/ac97c.c: fix error return code

2012-08-19 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr In the first case, the second test of whether retval is negative is redundant. It is dropped and the previous and subsequent tests are combined. In the second case, add an initialization of retval on failure of ioremap. A simplified version of the