From: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit fa1d113a0f96f9ab7e4fe4f8825753ba1e34a9d3 ]

conn->state_lock may be taken in softirq mode, but a previous patch
replaced an outer lock in the response-packet event handling code, and lost
the _bh from that when doing so.

Fix this by applying the _bh annotation to the state_lock locking.

Fixes: a1399f8bb033 ("rxrpc: Call channels should have separate call number 
spaces")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
index 447f55ca68860..6e972b4823efa 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
@@ -340,18 +340,18 @@ static int rxrpc_process_event(struct rxrpc_connection 
*conn,
                        return ret;
 
                spin_lock(&conn->channel_lock);
-               spin_lock(&conn->state_lock);
+               spin_lock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
 
                if (conn->state == RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE_CHALLENGING) {
                        conn->state = RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE;
-                       spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock);
+                       spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
                        for (loop = 0; loop < RXRPC_MAXCALLS; loop++)
                                rxrpc_call_is_secure(
                                        rcu_dereference_protected(
                                                conn->channels[loop].call,
                                                
lockdep_is_held(&conn->channel_lock)));
                } else {
-                       spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock);
+                       spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
                }
 
                spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock);
-- 
2.25.1



Reply via email to