On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 05:29:24PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 14:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> > > psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 14:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> > psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
> > parameter and convert the index into a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
> parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
> power_state parameter before calling the
On 22/07/2019 17:37, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
> parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
> power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND()
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:38, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
>
> Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
> parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
> power_state parameter before calling the
Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it.
This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI
6 matches
Mail list logo
