On Thu, 15 May 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> > > "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may cr
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> > "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may create confusion
> > with the notion of energy consumpt
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:57:10PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
> "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may create confusion
> with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally.
>
> This cont
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to
"CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler may create confusion
with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally.
This contains the architecture visible changes. Incidentally, only ARM
takes adva
4 matches
Mail list logo