On 04/03/2014 12:35 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:08:55PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800,
On 04/03/2014 12:35 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:08:55PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:08:55PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>
> On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
> >>On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:08:55PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo
On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking
On 03/29/2014 09:45 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
The usage of
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>
> On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> >>From: Hongbo Zhang
> >>
> >>The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:37PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
instead.
On 03/26/2014 03:01 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Hongbo Zhang
>
> The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
> required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
> instead. Interrupts will be turned off and
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:47 +0800, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
instead. Interrupts will be
From: Hongbo Zhang
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
instead. Interrupts will be turned off and context will be saved, it is
unnecessary to use irqsave.
This patch changes all
From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com
The usage of spin_lock_irqsave() is a stronger locking mechanism than is
required throughout the driver. The minimum locking required should be used
instead. Interrupts will be turned off and context will be saved, it is
unnecessary to use irqsave.
14 matches
Mail list logo