Oleg Nesterov writes:
> On 07/18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> -BUG_ON((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL);
>> +BUG_ON((reason < POLL_IN) || (reason > NSIGPOLL));
> ^
> looks obviously
On 07/18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> - BUG_ON((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL);
> + BUG_ON((reason < POLL_IN) || (reason > NSIGPOLL));
^
looks obviously wrong? Say, POLL_IN is obviously
We have a weird and problematic intersection of features that when
they all come together result in ambiguous siginfo values, that
we can not support properly.
- Supporting fcntl(F_SETSIG,...) with arbitrary valid signals.
- Using positive values for POLL_IN, POLL_OUT, POLL_MSG, ..., etc
that i
3 matches
Mail list logo