Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-19 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/19/2017 12:57 AM, Gregory Fong wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: >> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing,

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-19 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/19/2017 12:57 AM, Gregory Fong wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: >> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-19 Thread Gregory Fong
Hi Doug, On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke > >> the 1:1 mapping between a

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-19 Thread Gregory Fong
Hi Doug, On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke > >> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-16 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/04/2017 02:24 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: >>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke >>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-16 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/04/2017 02:24 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: >>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke >>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-04 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke >> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its >> interrupt domain. > > Out

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-04 Thread Doug Berger
On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke >> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its >> interrupt domain. > > Out of curiosity, what

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-03 Thread Gregory Fong
Hi Doug, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke > the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its > interrupt domain. Out of curiosity, what sort of problems have you seen from

Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-10-03 Thread Gregory Fong
Hi Doug, On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke > the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its > interrupt domain. Out of curiosity, what sort of problems have you seen from this? > > This

[PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-09-29 Thread Doug Berger
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its interrupt domain. This commit consolidates the per bank irq domains to a version where we have one larger interrupt domain per GPIO controller instance spanning

[PATCH 6/7] gpio: brcmstb: consolidate interrupt domains

2017-09-29 Thread Doug Berger
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its interrupt domain. This commit consolidates the per bank irq domains to a version where we have one larger interrupt domain per GPIO controller instance spanning