On 10/19/2017 12:57 AM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing,
On 10/19/2017 12:57 AM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
Hi Doug,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
> >> the 1:1 mapping between a
Hi Doug,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> >> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
> >> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's
On 10/04/2017 02:24 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
>>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's
On 10/04/2017 02:24 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
>>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
>> interrupt domain.
>
> Out
On 10/03/2017 08:03 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
>> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
>> interrupt domain.
>
> Out of curiosity, what
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
> interrupt domain.
Out of curiosity, what sort of problems have you seen from
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
> the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
> interrupt domain.
Out of curiosity, what sort of problems have you seen from this?
>
> This
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
interrupt domain.
This commit consolidates the per bank irq domains to a version
where we have one larger interrupt domain per GPIO controller
instance spanning
The GPIOLIB IRQ chip helpers were very appealing, but badly broke
the 1:1 mapping between a GPIO controller's device_node and its
interrupt domain.
This commit consolidates the per bank irq domains to a version
where we have one larger interrupt domain per GPIO controller
instance spanning
12 matches
Mail list logo