On 01/22/2014 06:57 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> Thanks, very useful. We'll give it a try when we get there. So far I
> NAK'ed the first set of arm64 ILP32 patches as they were mostly using
> the compat ABI (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/9/502).
>
That's mostly where we started out, too.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:06:11PM +, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:25:10PM +, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> Both x32 and x86-64 use the same struct semid64_ds for system calls.
> >> But x32 long is 32-bit. This patch replac
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:25:10PM +, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Both x32 and x86-64 use the same struct semid64_ds for system calls.
>> But x32 long is 32-bit. This patch replaces unsigned long with
>> __kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:25:10PM +, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Both x32 and x86-64 use the same struct semid64_ds for system calls.
> But x32 long is 32-bit. This patch replaces unsigned long with
> __kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds.
>
> Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu
> ---
> arch/x86/include/uapi/a
Both x32 and x86-64 use the same struct semid64_ds for system calls.
But x32 long is 32-bit. This patch replaces unsigned long with
__kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds.
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sembuf.h | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletio
Both x32 and x86-64 use the same struct semid64_ds for system calls.
But x32 long is 32-bit. This patch replaces unsigned long with
__kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds.
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sembuf.h | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletio
6 matches
Mail list logo
