On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:20:14PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > Indications from Johannes tha
On 12/13/2013 09:10 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Indications from Johannes that he wanted this. Needs some data and/or
> justification why
> thrash protection needs it plus docs describing how MPOL_LOCAL is now
> different before
> it should be considered finished. I do not necessarily agree this patc
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:20:14PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Indications from Johannes that he wanted this. Needs some data and/or
> > > justification why
> > > t
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:04:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Indications from Johannes that he wanted this. Needs some data and/or
> > justification why
> > thrash protection needs it plus docs describing how MPOL_LOCAL is now
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Indications from Johannes that he wanted this. Needs some data and/or
> justification why
> thrash protection needs it plus docs describing how MPOL_LOCAL is now
> different before
> it should be considered finished. I do not necessari
Indications from Johannes that he wanted this. Needs some data and/or
justification why
thrash protection needs it plus docs describing how MPOL_LOCAL is now different
before
it should be considered finished. I do not necessarily agree this patch is
necessary
but it's worth punting it out there
6 matches
Mail list logo