Hi Alexandru,
On 1/12/21 5:16 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 1/12/21 4:04 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> Instead of converting the vgic_io_device handle to a kvm_io_device
>>> handled and then do the oppositive, pass a
Hi Eric,
On 1/12/21 4:04 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Instead of converting the vgic_io_device handle to a kvm_io_device
>> handled and then do the oppositive, pass a vgic_io_device pointer all
>> along the call chain.
> To me, it looks like
Hi Eric,
On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Instead of converting the vgic_io_device handle to a kvm_io_device
> handled and then do the oppositive, pass a vgic_io_device pointer all
> along the call chain.
To me, it looks like the commit message describes what the patch does instead of
Instead of converting the vgic_io_device handle to a kvm_io_device
handled and then do the oppositive, pass a vgic_io_device pointer all
along the call chain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
4 matches
Mail list logo