From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good
From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good to reserve the number just in
From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good
From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good to reserve the number just in
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 1:47:25 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
> them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
> table.
>
> According to Arnd:
>
> Even if
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 1:47:25 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
> them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
> table.
>
> According to Arnd:
>
> Even if the support is x86 specific
From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good
From: Dave Hansen
These new syscalls are implemented as generic code, so enable
them for architectures like arm64 which use the generic syscall
table.
According to Arnd:
Even if the support is x86 specific for the forseeable
future, it may be good to reserve the number just in
8 matches
Mail list logo