On Fri 2006-11-17 19:33:52, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 01:27:10AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > that long mode is supported. Asking if long mode is implemented is
> > > down right silly but we have traditionally had some of these checks,
> > > and they can't hurt
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 01:27:10AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > that long mode is supported. Asking if long mode is implemented is
> > down right silly but we have traditionally had some of these checks,
> > and they can't hurt anything. So when the totally ludicrous happens
> > we jus
Hi!
> that long mode is supported. Asking if long mode is implemented is
> down right silly but we have traditionally had some of these checks,
> and they can't hurt anything. So when the totally ludicrous happens
> we just might handle it correctly.
Well, it is silly, and it is 50 lines of den
This modifies the SMP trampoline and all of the associated code so
it can jump to a 64bit kernel loaded at an arbitrary address.
The dependencies on having an idenetity mapped page in the kernel
page tables for SMP bootup have all been removed.
In addition the trampoline has been modified to ve
4 matches
Mail list logo
