Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Dongsheng Yang
On 02/24/2014 06:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that i

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? The problem is that it never actually made it to my inbox; coul

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 05:05:36PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Hi Peter. > It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip > except this one. > What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? I might have just missed it; fail on my end. I'll try and sort

Re: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-22 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Hi Peter. It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one. What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do? Thanx On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote: Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang cc: Steven Rostedt cc: Frederic Weisbecker c

[PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.

2014-02-10 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang cc: Steven Rostedt cc: Frederic Weisbecker cc: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c index a5457d5