Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 15/31] PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:25:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On 6/8/2019 1:46 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" [ Upstream commit d491f2b75237ef37d8867830ab7fad8d9659e853 ] If a PCI driver leaves the device handled by it in D0 and calls pci_save_state() on the device in i

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 15/31] PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue

On 6/8/2019 1:46 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" [ Upstream commit d491f2b75237ef37d8867830ab7fad8d9659e853 ] If a PCI driver leaves the device handled by it in D0 and calls pci_save_state() on the device in its ->suspend() or ->suspend_late() callback, it can expect the devic

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 15/31] PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" [ Upstream commit d491f2b75237ef37d8867830ab7fad8d9659e853 ] If a PCI driver leaves the device handled by it in D0 and calls pci_save_state() on the device in its ->suspend() or ->suspend_late() callback, it can expect the device to stay in D0 over the whole s2idle cycl