On 09/21/2017 03:03 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi,
> the first patch in this series fixes a bug that causes bfq to fail to
> guarantee a high responsiveness on some drives, if there is heavy
> random read+write I/O in the background. More precisely, such a
> failure allowed this bug to be found [1]
Hi,
the first patch in this series fixes a bug that causes bfq to fail to
guarantee a high responsiveness on some drives, if there is heavy
random read+write I/O in the background. More precisely, such a
failure allowed this bug to be found [1], but the bug may well cause
other yet unreported anoma
2 matches
Mail list logo
