On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 12:43PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 11/21/2015 09:59 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > Ignore RX-related interrupts if RX is not enabled.
>
> This doesn't look like a safe approach; fast-forward a couple of years and
> some is trying to add some feature but can't figure out
On 11/21/2015 09:59 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> Ignore RX-related interrupts if RX is not enabled.
This doesn't look like a safe approach; fast-forward a couple of years and
some is trying to add some feature but can't figure out why no data is
arriving...
What is this trying to solve?
Regards,
Ignore RX-related interrupts if RX is not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann
---
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
index db9e23eaf300
3 matches
Mail list logo