@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] qib:Fix concurrent access in the function,
> qib_init_iba6120_funcs
>
>
>
> On 2016-03-07 11:34 AM, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> >> This fixes concurrent access in the function, qib_init_iba6120_funcs
>
> From: nick [mailto:xerofo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:21 PM
> To: Marciniszyn, Mike
> Cc: dledf...@redhat.com; Hefty, Sean ;
> hal.rosenst...@gmail.com; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] qib:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:34:04PM +, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > This fixes concurrent access in the function, qib_init_iba6120_funcs by
> > locking
> > around the calls to when setting up f_sendctrl and f_set_armlauch function
> > pointers to the functions, sendctrl_6120_mod
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:34:04PM +, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > This fixes concurrent access in the function, qib_init_iba6120_funcs by
> > locking
> > around the calls to when setting up f_sendctrl and f_set_armlauch function
> > pointers to the functions, sendctrl_6120_mod
> This fixes concurrent access in the function, qib_init_iba6120_funcs by
> locking
> around the calls to when setting up f_sendctrl and f_set_armlauch function
> pointers to the functions, sendctrl_6120_mod qib_set_6120_armlaunch due to
> these functions needing to have their caller to hold the
> This fixes concurrent access in the function, qib_init_iba6120_funcs by
> locking
> around the calls to when setting up f_sendctrl and f_set_armlauch function
> pointers to the functions, sendctrl_6120_mod qib_set_6120_armlaunch due to
> these functions needing to have their caller to hold the
6 matches
Mail list logo
