Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

2021-03-10 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Tue 09 Mar 02:03 CST 2021, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 03/09/2020 06.00, Samuel Holland wrote: > > Stephen, Maxime, > > > > You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a > > driver-independent way: > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753832.html > >

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

2021-03-10 Thread Samuel Holland
On 3/10/21 2:56 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:03:14AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> On 03/09/2020 06.00, Samuel Holland wrote: >>> Stephen, Maxime, >>> >>> You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a >>> driver-independent way: >>>

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

2021-03-10 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:03:14AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 03/09/2020 06.00, Samuel Holland wrote: > > Stephen, Maxime, > > > > You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a > > driver-independent way: > > > >

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

2021-03-09 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 03/09/2020 06.00, Samuel Holland wrote: > Stephen, Maxime, > > You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a > driver-independent way: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753832.html > > I provided an implementation 6 months ago, which I am resending

[PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

2020-09-02 Thread Samuel Holland
Stephen, Maxime, You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a driver-independent way: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753832.html I provided an implementation 6 months ago, which I am resending now: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11398629/ Do you