Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-09-16 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Lee, On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> So what I propose is to do it incrementally: >> >> 1) Merge Lee's series since that is definitely a step in the right >> direction to not make an I2C table mandatory (still will

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-09-15 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > [adding Sjoerd as cc who was the one that raised the module auto-loading > issue] > > Hello, > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > >> Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss > >> anothe

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-09-12 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
[adding Sjoerd as cc who was the one that raised the module auto-loading issue] Hello, On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> >> Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss >> another merge-window. This patch-set has the support of some pretty >> senior

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-09-12 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:35:30PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss > another merge-window. This patch-set has the support of some pretty > senior kernel maintainers, so I hope acceptance shouldn't be too > difficult. >

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-08-29 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss > > another merge-window. > > Nope, we won't. I'll still need a week or so due to other duties. Perfectly reasonable. > > This patch-set has the support of some pretty > > senior kern

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-08-29 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Lee, > Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss > another merge-window. Nope, we won't. I'll still need a week or so due to other duties. > This patch-set has the support of some pretty > senior kernel maintainers, so I hope acceptance shouldn't be too > difficult.

[PATCH RESEND 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

2014-08-28 Thread Lee Jones
Hi Wolfram, Placing this firmly back on your plate. I truly hope we don't miss another merge-window. This patch-set has the support of some pretty senior kernel maintainers, so I hope acceptance shouldn't be too difficult. As previously discussed I believe it should be okay for an I2C device dr