On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> So, just to be clear: you better not apply your patch; it might break
> something ;-).
Sounds good to me. :)
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to ma
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Ka
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
Before:
syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>>> Before:
>>> syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD, 0, 0) = 286965
>>> syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR, "<12>"...
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Before:
>> syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD, 0, 0) = 286965
>> syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR, "<12>"..., 100) = 24000
>> syslog(SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD, 0, 0
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 17:49 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Linus Torvalds
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk
>> >> wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 17:49 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On a 2.6.31 system, immediately after SYSLOG_ACTI
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On a 2.6.31 system, immediately after SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR, a
>>> SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD returns 0.
>>
>> Hmm,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk
> wrote:
>
>> On a 2.6.31 system, immediately after SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR, a
>> SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD returns 0.
>
> Hmm, sounds like the right thing to do.
Right.
And that's the *OLD*
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> From: Kay Sievers
> [...]
>> case SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD:
>> - error = log_end - log_start;
>> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
>> +
Hi Kay,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> From: Kay Sievers
[...]
> case SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD:
> - error = log_end - log_start;
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
> + if (syslog_seq < log_first_seq) {
> +
11 matches
Mail list logo
