On 24/02/15 10:21, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 19 February 2015 at 18:18, Morten Rasmussen
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>> Agreed. I think it is reasonable to assume that th
On 19 February 2015 at 18:18, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining
>> > compute
>> > capacity for CF
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining
> > compute
> > capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity
>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining compute
> capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity
> scaled
> down by a factor (aka scale_rt_capacity). This estimation of avail
The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining compute
capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity scaled
down by a factor (aka scale_rt_capacity). This estimation of available capacity
must also be invariant with frequency scaling.
A frequency
5 matches
Mail list logo