On 2020/12/31 20:22, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-12-31 11:58, Shenming Lu wrote:
>> On 2020/12/31 16:57, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi Shemming,
>>>
>>> On 2020-12-31 06:28, Shenming Lu wrote:
When the EnableLPIs bit is set to 0, any ITS LPI requests in the
Redistributor would be ignored.
On 2020-12-31 11:58, Shenming Lu wrote:
On 2020/12/31 16:57, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Shemming,
On 2020-12-31 06:28, Shenming Lu wrote:
When the EnableLPIs bit is set to 0, any ITS LPI requests in the
Redistributor would be ignored. And this check is independent from
the ITS LPI translation. So
On 2020/12/31 16:57, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Shemming,
>
> On 2020-12-31 06:28, Shenming Lu wrote:
>> When the EnableLPIs bit is set to 0, any ITS LPI requests in the
>> Redistributor would be ignored. And this check is independent from
>> the ITS LPI translation. So it might be better to move
Hi Shemming,
On 2020-12-31 06:28, Shenming Lu wrote:
When the EnableLPIs bit is set to 0, any ITS LPI requests in the
Redistributor would be ignored. And this check is independent from
the ITS LPI translation. So it might be better to move the check
of the EnableLPIs bit out of the LPI
When the EnableLPIs bit is set to 0, any ITS LPI requests in the
Redistributor would be ignored. And this check is independent from
the ITS LPI translation. So it might be better to move the check
of the EnableLPIs bit out of the LPI resolving, and also add it
to the path that uses the translation
5 matches
Mail list logo
