On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:49:19AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:38:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:49:19AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:38:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:38:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > > In patch 06beb72fbe23e
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:38:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > > In patch 06beb72fbe23e
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit
> > > task
> > >
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:29:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit
> > > task
> > >
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit
> > task
> > information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:39:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit
> > task
> > information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a
Hi Yury,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit task
> information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a single flag
> -
> TIF_32BIT. It looks hacky to me for three reasons:
> - The
Hi Yury,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit task
> information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a single flag
> -
> TIF_32BIT. It looks hacky to me for three reasons:
> - The
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:10:05AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 31 July 2017 08:18 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> > - If we start using TIF flags here, we cannot easily add new mm_context
> > specific bits because they may mess with TIF ones.
>
> This one seems convincing
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:10:05AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 31 July 2017 08:18 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> > - If we start using TIF flags here, we cannot easily add new mm_context
> > specific bits because they may mess with TIF ones.
>
> This one seems convincing
On Monday 31 July 2017 08:18 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
- If we start using TIF flags here, we cannot easily add new mm_context
specific bits because they may mess with TIF ones.
This one seems convincing argument. ATM do you have any mm_context flag which
would you like to incorporate?
On Monday 31 July 2017 08:18 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
- If we start using TIF flags here, we cannot easily add new mm_context
specific bits because they may mess with TIF ones.
This one seems convincing argument. ATM do you have any mm_context flag which
would you like to incorporate?
Hi Pratyush, Catalin
In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit task
information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a single flag -
TIF_32BIT. It looks hacky to me for three reasons:
- The flag is introduced for the case where it's impossible to get
Hi Pratyush, Catalin
In patch 06beb72fbe23e ("arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit task
information") you introduce the field flags but use it only for a single flag -
TIF_32BIT. It looks hacky to me for three reasons:
- The flag is introduced for the case where it's impossible to get
16 matches
Mail list logo