Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 19:37 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On 21.07.2015 18:37, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >> On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On 21.07.2015 18:37, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Thu,

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300,

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On 21.07.2015 18:37, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 19:37 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On 21.07.2015 18:37, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 13:25 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-21 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On 21.07.2015 00:08, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-20 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada > wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >> IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via > >> common ACPI interface

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-20 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 07:36 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-17 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:00 AM, ethan zhao wrote: > > On 2015/7/17 2:17, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >> >> IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via >> common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal >> support in intel_pstate to receive and

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-17 Thread ethan zhao
On 2015/7/17 2:17, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. * ignore limit of top state in _PPC: it

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-17 Thread ethan zhao
On 2015/7/17 2:17, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. * ignore limit of top state in _PPC: it

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-17 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:00 AM, ethan zhao ethan.z...@oracle.com wrote: On 2015/7/17 2:17, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: >> IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via >> common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal >> support in

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via > common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal > support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. > > * ignore limit

[PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. * ignore limit of top state in _PPC: it lower than turbo boost frequency * register

[PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. * ignore limit of top state in _PPC: it lower than turbo boost frequency * register

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Konstantin Khlebnikov
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada srinivas.pandruv...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required

Re: [PATCH RFC] intel_pstate: play well with frequency limits set by acpi

2015-07-16 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:17 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: IPMI can control CPU P-states remotely: configuration is reported via common ACPI interface (_PPC/_PSS/etc). This patch adds required minimal support in intel_pstate to receive and use these P-state limits. * ignore limit of top