Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Just want to mention that this patch breaks older versions of valgrind > (including the current release) > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357833 Ugh. Looks like valgrind is doing something that fundamentally can't be

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:42:11 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > >> changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:42:11PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > >> changelog (to point where problem came from).

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the >> changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you >> fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? > >

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:42:11 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > >>

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:42:11PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > >> changelog (to point where

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Just want to mention that this patch breaks older versions of valgrind > (including the current release) > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357833 Ugh. Looks like valgrind is doing something that

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On 12/28/2015 11:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the >> changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you >> fine with accounting not only anonymous

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 03:10:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:10:15 +0300 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: ... > > This clashes with > mm-mmapc-remove-redundant-local-variables-for-may_expand_vm.patch, > below. I resolved it thusly: > > bool may_expand_vm(struct mm_struct *mm,

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 02:22:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > > changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you > > fine with accounting not only anonymous

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 02:22:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > > changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you > > fine with accounting

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 03:10:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:10:15 +0300 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: ... > > This clashes with > mm-mmapc-remove-redundant-local-variables-for-may_expand_vm.patch, > below. I resolved it thusly: > > bool

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:10:15 +0300 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > When inspecting a vague code inside prctl(PR_SET_MM_MEM) > call (which testing the RLIMIT_DATA value to figure out > if we're allowed to assign new @start_brk, @brk, @start_data, > @end_data from mm_struct) it's been commited that

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you > fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? The patch looks ok to me. I guess if somebody relies on

[PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? Guys, take a look please, comments are highly appreciated. --- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov When inspecting a vague

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the > changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you > fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? The patch looks ok to me. I guess if

[PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

Really sorry for delays. Konstantin, I slightly updated the changelog (to point where problem came from). Linus are you fine with accounting not only anonymous memory in VmData? Guys, take a look please, comments are highly appreciated. --- From: Konstantin Khlebnikov When

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Rework virtual memory accounting

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:10:15 +0300 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > When inspecting a vague code inside prctl(PR_SET_MM_MEM) > call (which testing the RLIMIT_DATA value to figure out > if we're allowed to assign new @start_brk, @brk, @start_data, > @end_data from mm_struct) it's been

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:12:38AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Here several rated changes bundled together: > * keep vma counting if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, will be used for limits > * replace mm->shared_vm with better defined mm->data_vm > * account anonymous executable areas as executable >

[PATCH RFC] mm: rework virtual memory accounting

Here several rated changes bundled together: * keep vma counting if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, will be used for limits * replace mm->shared_vm with better defined mm->data_vm * account anonymous executable areas as executable * account file-backed growsdown/up areas as stack * drop struct file* argument

Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: rework virtual memory accounting

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:12:38AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Here several rated changes bundled together: > * keep vma counting if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, will be used for limits > * replace mm->shared_vm with better defined mm->data_vm > * account anonymous executable areas as executable >

[PATCH RFC] mm: rework virtual memory accounting

Here several rated changes bundled together: * keep vma counting if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, will be used for limits * replace mm->shared_vm with better defined mm->data_vm * account anonymous executable areas as executable * account file-backed growsdown/up areas as stack * drop struct file* argument