Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: anatop: Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel

2014-03-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:53:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel and then convert to use > regulator_[set|get]_voltage_sel_regmap for [set|get]_voltage_sel callbacks. Applied, thanks - if there's a problem I guess doing this will shake it out!

Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: anatop: Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel

2014-03-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:53:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel and then convert to use regulator_[set|get]_voltage_sel_regmap for [set|get]_voltage_sel callbacks. Applied, thanks - if there's a problem I guess doing this will shake it out!

[PATCH RFC] regulator: anatop: Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel

2014-02-21 Thread Axel Lin
Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel and then convert to use regulator_[set|get]_voltage_sel_regmap for [set|get]_voltage_sel callbacks. The anatop-reg-offset property is a required property rather than optional property. So the question is what is the meaning of setting

[PATCH RFC] regulator: anatop: Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel

2014-02-21 Thread Axel Lin
Remove checking control_reg in [set|get]_voltage_sel and then convert to use regulator_[set|get]_voltage_sel_regmap for [set|get]_voltage_sel callbacks. The anatop-reg-offset property is a required property rather than optional property. So the question is what is the meaning of setting