Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions

Em Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:32:31 -0700 Joe Perches escreveu: > On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 11:23 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > wrote: > > > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented, > > > it seems useful to have a tool which would help

Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions

On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 11:23 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented, > > it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what > > symbols aren't documented. > > > > This is a first step

Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions

On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented, > it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what > symbols aren't documented. > > This is a first step on this direction. The tool has some > limitations. Yet, it could

Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions

Hi Matthew/Jon, Em Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:53:34 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu: > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented, > it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what > symbols aren't documented. > > This is a first step on this direction. The tool

[PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with external functions

While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented, it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what symbols aren't documented. This is a first step on this direction. The tool has some limitations. Yet, it could be useful for maintainers to check about missing documents on