On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:59:23PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> +Mika
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:42:57 +0100
> Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
> > The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is
> > 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us
> > to rea
+Mika
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:42:57 +0100
Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is
> 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us
> to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic
> context sle
The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is
5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us
to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic
context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the
tight-loop here.
Si
3 matches
Mail list logo