Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mm: balancing the node zones occupancy

2021-02-23 Thread Charan Teja Kalla
Thanks Vlastimil for the review comments!! On 2/19/2021 4:56 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Can you share the use case for doing this? If it's to replace a failed RAM, > then > it's probably extremely rare, right. > >> We have the proof-of-concept code tried on the Snapdragon systems with >> the

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mm: balancing the node zones occupancy

2021-02-23 Thread Charan Teja Kalla
Thanks David for the review comments!! On 2/18/2021 11:46 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> I would like to start discussion about  balancing the occupancy of >> memory zones in a node in the system whose imabalance may be caused by >> migration of pages to other zones during hotremove and then

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mm: balancing the node zones occupancy

2021-02-19 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 2/18/21 6:24 PM, Charan Teja Reddy wrote: > I would like to start discussion about balancing the occupancy of > memory zones in a node in the system whose imabalance may be caused by > migration of pages to other zones during hotremove and then hotadding > same memory. In this case there is a

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mm: balancing the node zones occupancy

2021-02-18 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 18.02.21 18:24, Charan Teja Reddy wrote: I would like to start discussion about balancing the occupancy of memory zones in a node in the system whose imabalance may be caused by migration of pages to other zones during hotremove and then hotadding same memory. In this case there is a lot of

[PATCH RFC 0/1] mm: balancing the node zones occupancy

2021-02-18 Thread Charan Teja Reddy
I would like to start discussion about balancing the occupancy of memory zones in a node in the system whose imabalance may be caused by migration of pages to other zones during hotremove and then hotadding same memory. In this case there is a lot of free memory in newly hotadd memory which can