Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tero Kristo [181004 15:53]: > On 04/10/18 18:07, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: > > > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for > > > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll > > > > be

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tero Kristo [181004 15:53]: > On 04/10/18 18:07, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: > > > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for > > > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll > > > > be

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tero Kristo
On 04/10/18 18:07, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: It seems we should just provide a generic interface for clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems. The TI clock

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tero Kristo
On 04/10/18 18:07, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: It seems we should just provide a generic interface for clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems. The TI clock

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll > > be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems. > > The TI clock driver is actually providing

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tero Kristo [181004 14:47]: > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll > > be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems. > > The TI clock driver is actually providing

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tero Kristo
On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Andreas Kemnade [181004 05:56]: On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. Further research reveals

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tero Kristo
On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Andreas Kemnade [181004 05:56]: On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. Further research reveals

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Andreas Kemnade [181004 05:56]: > On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the > device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough > to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. > Further research reveals that hdq iclk must not be turned off

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Andreas Kemnade [181004 05:56]: > On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the > device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough > to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. > Further research reveals that hdq iclk must not be turned off

[PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-03 Thread Andreas Kemnade
On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. Further research reveals that hdq iclk must not be turned off during transfers, also according to the

[PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

2018-10-03 Thread Andreas Kemnade
On the gta04 with a dm3730 omap_hdq does not work properly when the device enters lower power states. Idling uart1 and 2 is enough to show up that problem, if there are no other things enabled. Further research reveals that hdq iclk must not be turned off during transfers, also according to the