On 2/5/21 6:36 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 1/29/21 2:49 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:08:37PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
This is a RFC series to support userfaultfd upon shmem and hugetlbfs.
>> ...
>>> Huge & Mike,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:29:56AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/5/21 6:36 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 1/29/21 2:49 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:08:37PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is a RFC series t
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:21:47PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > Huge & Mike,
> >
> > Would any of you have comment/concerns on the high-level design of this
> > series?
> >
> > It would be great to know it, especially major objection, before move on
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> Huge & Mike,
>
> Would any of you have comment/concerns on the high-level design of this
> series?
>
> It would be great to know it, especially major objection, before move on to an
> non-rfc version.
Seeing Mike's update prompts me to speak up: I have
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 1/29/21 2:49 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:08:37PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> This is a RFC series to support userfaultfd upon shmem and hugetlbfs.
> ...
> > Huge & Mike,
> >
> > Would any of you have comment/
On 1/29/21 2:49 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:08:37PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
>> This is a RFC series to support userfaultfd upon shmem and hugetlbfs.
...
> Huge & Mike,
>
> Would any of you have comment/concerns on the high-level design of this
> series?
>
> It would be great
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:08:37PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is a RFC series to support userfaultfd upon shmem and hugetlbfs.
>
> PS. Note that there's a known issue [0] with tlb against uffd-wp/soft-dirty in
> general and Nadav is working on it. It may or may not directly affect
> shmem/huge
This is a RFC series to support userfaultfd upon shmem and hugetlbfs.
PS. Note that there's a known issue [0] with tlb against uffd-wp/soft-dirty in
general and Nadav is working on it. It may or may not directly affect
shmem/hugetlbfs since there're no COW on shared mappings normally. Private
sh
8 matches
Mail list logo