Hi all,
I posted a new series of patches for this problem. I open another thread to
avoid
disorder this thread. Please see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/198
Thank you.
On 2015/1/25 0:39, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:40:02PM -0500, Jérémie Galarneau wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>>> b
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:40:02PM -0500, Jérémie Galarneau wrote:
SNIP
> > bt_ctf_clock_create() with the checked name and then free it. However, it
> > is hacky
> > and I think you won't like it.
>
> The prospect of seeing that code has convinced me to introduce
> int bt_ctf_validate_identifi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/22 21:27, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:36:43PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> (If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
>>> field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple method
>>>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:57:53AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/22 21:27, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:36:43PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> >> (If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
> >> field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
SNIP
> >> SNIP
> >>
> >>>
> >>> +/* If dup < 0, add a prefix. Else, add _dupl_X suffix. */
> >>> +static char *change_name(char *name, char *orig_name, int dup)
> >>> +{
> >>> + char *new_name = NULL;
> >>> + size_t len;
> >>> +
> >>> +
On 2015/1/23 9:57, Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/22 21:27, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:36:43PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> (If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
>>> field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple method
>>> for name conve
On 2015/1/22 21:27, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:36:43PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
>> (If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
>> field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple method
>> for name conversion. If not , perf must track name conv
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:36:43PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> (If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
> field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple method
> for name conversion. If not , perf must track name conversion by
> itself.)
>
> Some parameters
(If Steven Rostedt accept the previous patch which introduce a priv
field to 'struct format_field', we can use a relative simple method
for name conversion. If not , perf must track name conversion by
itself.)
Some parameters of syscall tracepoints named as 'nr', 'event', etc.
When dealing with
9 matches
Mail list logo
