On 01/02/2024 16:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:20:23 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok:
8<-
net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
Yup, just to be clear - you can send this independently from the s
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:20:23 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >BTW, I assume that changes like this are also ok:
> >
> >8<-
> >
> > net: team: Don't bother filling in ethtool driver version
Yup, just to be clear - you can send this independently from the series,
tag is as
[PATCH net-n
Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 01:57:16PM CET, john.g.ga...@oracle.com wrote:
>On 31/01/2024 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 + John Garry wrote:
>> > Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't
>> > need to rebuild the code just for the git head c
On 31/01/2024 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 + John Garry wrote:
Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't
need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
Yes, please!
Acked-by: Jakub Kicin
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:50 + John Garry wrote:
> Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't
> need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry
Yes, please!
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski
Instead of using UTS_RELEASE, use uts_release, which means that we don't
need to rebuild the code just for the git head commit changing.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
---
net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioc
6 matches
Mail list logo
