On 09/02/14 16:16, John Johansen wrote:
I'm fine with this, do you want me to pull it into my tree for our next push
or do you want this all to go together as a set?
Acked-by: John Johansen
I'm more than happy for individual maintainers to pull relevant patches
into their trees for the next
On 09/02/2014 03:32 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
> From: Vinícius Tinti
>
> Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
> compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
>
> struct {
> struct shash_desc shash;
> char
From: Vinícius Tinti
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char ctx[crypto_shash_descsize(apparmor_tfm)];
} desc;
This patch instead allocates the
From: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char ctx[crypto_shash_descsize(apparmor_tfm)];
} desc;
This patch
On 09/02/2014 03:32 PM, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
From: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com
Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
struct {
struct shash_desc shash;
char
On 09/02/14 16:16, John Johansen wrote:
I'm fine with this, do you want me to pull it into my tree for our next push
or do you want this all to go together as a set?
Acked-by: John Johansen john.johan...@canonical.com
I'm more than happy for individual maintainers to pull relevant patches
6 matches
Mail list logo
