On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:02:54PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:53:54PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > kmap_atomic() is always
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:53:54PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > kmap_atomic() is always preferred over kmap()/kmap_thread().
> > > kmap_atomic() is _much_ more
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > kmap_atomic() is always preferred over kmap()/kmap_thread().
> > kmap_atomic() is _much_ more lightweight since its TLB invalidation is
> > always CPU-local and never
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> kmap_atomic() is always preferred over kmap()/kmap_thread().
> kmap_atomic() is _much_ more lightweight since its TLB invalidation is
> always CPU-local and never broadcast.
>
> So, basically, unless you *must* sleep while the mapping
On 10/12/20 9:19 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:56:35PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
>>> And I still don't really understand. After this patchset, there is still
>>> code
>>> nearly identical to the above (doing a temporary mapping just for a memcpy)
>>> that
>>> would still be
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:56:35PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> >
> > And I still don't really understand. After this patchset, there is still
> > code
> > nearly identical to the above (doing a temporary mapping just for a memcpy)
> > that
> > would still be using kmap_atomic().
>
> I don't
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:30:36PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:34:34PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > > > The kmap() calls in
On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 14:34 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny
> >
> > The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To
> > avoid the over head of global PKRS updates use the new
> > kmap_thread()
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:34:34PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > > The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To avoid
> > > the over head
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:34:34PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To avoid
> > the over head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call.
> >
> > @@
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:49:57PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny
>
> The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To avoid
> the over head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call.
>
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Cc: Chao Yu
> Signed-off-by: Ira
From: Ira Weiny
The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To avoid
the over head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call.
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Cc: Chao Yu
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
12 matches
Mail list logo
