[PATCH RFC V4 6/6] perf top: check the cost of perf_top__mmap_read

[kan . liang]

From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>

The latency of perf_top__mmap_read should be lower than refresh time.
If not, give some hints to reduce the overhead.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
index 03090d0..b5143c9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
@@ -863,11 +863,20 @@ static void perf_top__mmap_read_idx(struct perf_top *top, 
int idx)
 
 static void perf_top__mmap_read(struct perf_top *top)
 {
+       unsigned long long s, e;
        int i;
 
        perf_evlist__toggle_bkw_mmap(top->evlist, BKW_MMAP_DATA_PENDING);
+       s = rdclock();
        for (i = 0; i < top->evlist->nr_mmaps; i++)
                perf_top__mmap_read_idx(top, i);
+       e = rdclock();
+       if ((e - s) > (unsigned long long)(top->delay_secs * NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
+               ui__warning("Too slow to read ring buffer.\n"
+                           "Please try increasing the period (-c) or\n"
+                           "decreasing the freq (-F) or\n"
+                           "limiting the number of CPUs (-C)\n");
+       }
        perf_evlist__toggle_bkw_mmap(top->evlist, BKW_MMAP_EMPTY);
        perf_evlist__toggle_bkw_mmap(top->evlist, BKW_MMAP_RUNNING);
 }
-- 
2.5.5