Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay

2020-11-15 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:22:06AM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:32 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > [...] > > > +amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps: > > > + default: 0 > > >description: > > > The internal RGMII RX clock

Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay

2020-11-15 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:32 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: [...] > > +amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps: > > + default: 0 > >description: > > The internal RGMII RX clock delay (provided by this IP block) > > in > > -nanoseconds. When phy-mode is

Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay

2020-11-14 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 09:01:01PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Amlogic Meson G12A, G12B and SM1 SoCs have a more advanced RGMII RX > delay register which allows picoseconds precision. Deprecate the old > "amlogic,rx-delay-ns" in favour of a new "amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps" > property. > >

[PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay

2020-11-14 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
Amlogic Meson G12A, G12B and SM1 SoCs have a more advanced RGMII RX delay register which allows picoseconds precision. Deprecate the old "amlogic,rx-delay-ns" in favour of a new "amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps" property. For older SoCs the only known supported values were 0ns and 2ns. The new SoCs