On 14/08/15 13:30, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
> On 14/08/15 09:31, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>>> On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>> On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob
On 14/08/15 09:31, Bob Liu wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>> On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
> On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axb
On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
> On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM,
On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>>> On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
> ...
>> Hello,
>>
On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>> On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
...
> Hello,
>
> We rerun the tests for sequential reads w
On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
Hi,
Our measurements for the multiqu
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>>> On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a cle
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
>> On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
Hi,
Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a clear improvement
in iops when more que
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
Hi,
Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a clear improvement
in iops when more queues are used.
The measurements were obtained under the following c
On 08/10/2015 07:03 PM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
> On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a clear improvement
>>> in iops when more queues are used.
>>>
>>> The measurements were obtain
On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a clear improvement
>> in iops when more queues are used.
>>
>> The measurements were obtained under the following conditions:
>>
>> - using blkback a
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
On 13/05/15 11:29, Bob Liu wrote:
On 04/28/2015 03:46 PM, Arianna Avanzini wrote:
Hello Christoph,
Il 28/04/2015 09:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
What happened to this patchset?
It was passed on to Bob Liu, who published a follow-up patchs
On 06/30/2015 10:21 PM, Marcus Granado wrote:
> On 13/05/15 11:29, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On 04/28/2015 03:46 PM, Arianna Avanzini wrote:
>>> Hello Christoph,
>>>
>>> Il 28/04/2015 09:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
What happened to this patchset?
>>>
>>> It was passed on to Bob Liu, who
On 13/05/15 11:29, Bob Liu wrote:
On 04/28/2015 03:46 PM, Arianna Avanzini wrote:
Hello Christoph,
Il 28/04/2015 09:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
What happened to this patchset?
It was passed on to Bob Liu, who published a follow-up patchset here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/15/46
On 04/28/2015 03:46 PM, Arianna Avanzini wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> Il 28/04/2015 09:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
>> What happened to this patchset?
>>
>
> It was passed on to Bob Liu, who published a follow-up patchset here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/15/46
>
Right, and then I wa
Hello Christoph,
Il 28/04/2015 09:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
What happened to this patchset?
It was passed on to Bob Liu, who published a follow-up patchset here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/15/46
Thanks,
Arianna
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
What happened to this patchset?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> Any comments or suggestions are more than welcome.
Hey Arianna,
Thank you for posting this patchset. I've gone over each patchset and the design
looks quite sound. There are just a some required changes mentioned by
Christopher,
David, and me in regards to the different uses of APIs and such.
Hello,
this patchset adds to the Xen PV block driver support to exploit the multi-
queue block layer API by sharing and using multiple I/O rings in the frontend
and backend. It is the result of my internship for GNOME's Outreach Program
for Women ([1]), in which I was mentored by Konrad Rzeszutek
19 matches
Mail list logo
