On 03/13/2013 02:59 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
>
>> It's pointless to check "af.alt_bit1 == UNUSED" twice.
>> This looks like a copy-paste bug, I think what we want is to check if *both*
>> af.alt_bit1 and af.alt_bit2 are UNUSED.
>>
>> Signed-off-b
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> It's pointless to check "af.alt_bit1 == UNUSED" twice.
> This looks like a copy-paste bug, I think what we want is to check if *both*
> af.alt_bit1 and af.alt_bit2 are UNUSED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
Tentatively applied to fixes, waiting for
It's pointless to check "af.alt_bit1 == UNUSED" twice.
This looks like a copy-paste bug, I think what we want is to check if *both*
af.alt_bit1 and af.alt_bit2 are UNUSED.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
Hi,
I don't have the datasheet and hw.
I'd appreciate if someone can review and test this patch.
3 matches
Mail list logo