Re: [PATCH RT] Move RECURSION_LIMIT define up for more global use (take 2)

* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I sent this out once before but it must have slipped under the > radar. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/28/325 thanks - applied. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH RT] Move RECURSION_LIMIT define up for more global use (take 2)

* Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I sent this out once before but it must have slipped under the radar. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/28/325 thanks - applied. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

[PATCH RT] Move RECURSION_LIMIT define up for more global use (take 2)

OK, I sent this out once before but it must have slipped under the radar. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/28/325 My config fails miserably with lockdep: kernel/lockdep.c: In function 'find_usage_forwards': kernel/lockdep.c:814: error: 'RECURSION_LIMIT' undeclared (first use in this function)

[PATCH RT] Move RECURSION_LIMIT define up for more global use (take 2)

OK, I sent this out once before but it must have slipped under the radar. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/28/325 My config fails miserably with lockdep: kernel/lockdep.c: In function 'find_usage_forwards': kernel/lockdep.c:814: error: 'RECURSION_LIMIT' undeclared (first use in this function)