Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1

2015-08-08 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1] On 08/08/2015 (Sat 19:23) Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:10:17 -0400 > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > > So we took 20 IRQs in 5s, or 4/s ; not quite the 1/s minimum, but > > definitely not > > the HZ

Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1

2015-08-08 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:10:17 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > So we took 20 IRQs in 5s, or 4/s ; not quite the 1/s minimum, but definitely > not > the HZ/s we'd get w/o NOHZ_FULL. Re-running it got consistently 18-20 IRQ / > 5s. OK, so NO_HZ_FULL still isn't great on -rt, but this shows that it

Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1

2015-08-08 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[[PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1] On 06/08/2015 (Thu 18:17) Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Dear RT Folks, > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.48-rt49-rc1. > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. > > The -rc rel

[PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1

2015-08-06 Thread Steven Rostedt
Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.48-rt49-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release can