[Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1] On 08/08/2015 (Sat 19:23) Steven
Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:10:17 -0400
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>
> > So we took 20 IRQs in 5s, or 4/s ; not quite the 1/s minimum, but
> > definitely not
> > the HZ
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:10:17 -0400
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> So we took 20 IRQs in 5s, or 4/s ; not quite the 1/s minimum, but definitely
> not
> the HZ/s we'd get w/o NOHZ_FULL. Re-running it got consistently 18-20 IRQ /
> 5s.
OK, so NO_HZ_FULL still isn't great on -rt, but this shows that it
[[PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1] On 06/08/2015 (Thu 18:17) Steven
Rostedt wrote:
>
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.48-rt49-rc1.
>
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
>
> The -rc rel
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.48-rt49-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release can
4 matches
Mail list logo